| Deviant Login | Shop |
 | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
#AntyCopy
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
The fact that ANYONE on here is questioning or more accurately, trying to justify this, is insane. *533497 has been so right. It's advertising without a license or permission on DA and it's also posting an artwork that the member did not create (redistributed) on DA as their own copyright work. This is a serious no-no and is covered in multiple FAQ's. I'm glad it was reported.
You don't own it. Period. Even if you gave credit, you're still crediting it as yours when you post it on DA
DA is not a photobuecket. End of story :/
Here's a original to report it with: [link]
OK, here is my point of view. I work for Otakuthon (
If somebody post the pictures on this page somewhere on a blog or forum or anywhere, must they always contact us for permision?
I would like to know.
FAQ #574: Can I advertise on deviantART without purchasing an official advertising package?
Moreover, there's the fact that, the way DevART is set up, a copyright notice ascribed to the uploader is attached to every deviation posted by default. Some people thinking switching that to a Creative Commons license supersedes any spurious claim of ownership the copyright notice would yield, but this isn't true as the Creative Commons license actually works on top of normal copyright stipulations and simply grants a "usage license" in lieu of any sort of active agreement or case-by-case contract.